Home Parenting The advantages of fantasy fiction and imaginative play

The advantages of fantasy fiction and imaginative play

The advantages of fantasy fiction and imaginative play


Fantasy has historic roots, nevertheless it will get a nasty rap. Some fear that fantasy fiction could confuse younger kids. Others dismiss fantasy as foolish or frivolous. Ought to youngsters avoid fantasy play and fantasy leisure? Is studying fantasy fiction a waste of time? Quite the opposite! However research recommend we should always take a nuanced method to fantasy — one which considers a toddler’s private and developmental traits.

little girl, wearing a superhero cape, is standing on a hill, looking down at a city.

Some sorts of fantasy could also be too horrifying — or too cognitively taxing — for preschoolers to comply with. But younger kids are fairly savvy concerning the fantasy parts in fiction. They’re fast to establish them as inconceivable. And analysis signifies that fantasy fiction and fantasy play can profit youngsters. Partaking with fantasy can stimulate creativity and increase vocabulary. It might assist some kids develop higher self-regulation abilities. It would even improve their working reminiscence efficiency, and — beneath some circumstances — assist them uncover inventive options to issues.

So let’s check out the proof — the way in which kids reply to incredible tales and imaginative play.

Not so simply confused: Preschoolers perceive that fantasy eventualities can’t occur in actual life.

We frequently hear that younger kids can’t inform the distinction between fantasy and actuality. However is it true? Not likely. Not if what we imply is one thing like “preschoolers are liable to assume that Spiderman exists as a result of they’ve seen him in books or on tv.” In fact, preschoolers do make some errors of judgment, however not on this route. 

Most younger kids are literally hyper-skeptical. 

For instance, Andrew Shtluman and Susan Carey introduced four-year-olds with a collection of occasions in an illustrated storybook. Then they requested the kids to evaluate whether or not the occasions depicted may occur in actual life.

The children appropriately recognized inconceivable occasions – like a personality strolling by means of partitions. However in addition they incorrectly rejected many occasions that have been merely inconceivable – like a personality consuming onion juice, or proudly owning a lion as a pet (Shtulman and Carey 2007).

Equally, in experiments involving animated cartoons, Hui Li and her colleagues discovered proof that kids err on the facet of skepticism. “Even 4-year-olds have a reasonably good understanding of fantastical occasions in animated cartoons,” say the researchers. When these youngsters make errors, it tends to be within the route of dismissing sensible occasions as inconceivable (Li et al 2015).

The phenomenon could be noticed with non secular tales too.

In research of American kids from Christian properties, researchers discovered that 4-year-olds have been very skeptical of tales involving supernatural occasions and divine intervention (Wooley and Cox 2007; Vaden and Wooley 2011). Researchers didn’t see youngsters take a extra accepting stance till they have been 5 or 6, maybe as a result of youngsters this age usually tend to obtain express non secular instruction (Wooley and Ghossainy 2013).

So it isn’t that younger kids get issues unsuitable, or can’t be persuaded to imagine in incredible issues. They will. However experiments recommend we now have to actively sway them – present them with proof, or commerce on our grownup credibility to persuade kids {that a} incredible proposition is true (Subbotsky 1993; Boerger et al 2009).

If the fantasy is introduced as leisure, it isn’t very prone to encourage confusion – not, at any charge, to the type of confusion that will lead youngsters to assume that people can fly, or stroll by means of partitions, or flip themselves invisible.

However younger kids could wrestle with the fantasy versus actuality distinction if they’re very fearful

In research of preschoolers, youngsters affected by continual, excessive ranges of fearfulness carry out extra poorly on fantasy-reality exams. So you probably have a younger little one who experiences extreme nighttime fears – or a number of daytime nervousness – your little one is extra liable to imagine that, say, a supernatural monster truly exists (Zisenwine et al 2013; Petkova and Cain 2017).

And preschoolers usually choose sensible, down-to-earth eventualities.

Younger kids like to faux, however their playful adventures are sometimes fairly down-to-earth: They usually act out on a regular basis eventualities, or imitate mundane grownup behaviors — akin to cooking a meal, or driving automotive. Equally — in terms of consuming works of fiction — preschoolers favor naturalistic tales. Given the selection, they have a tendency to choose tales set in the actual world (Nyout and Lee 2022; Weisberg and Lee 2022).

Furthermore, it seems that fantasy tv (versus fantasy books, or fantasy, faux play) could have a short lived, disruptive impact on the manager operate efficiency of youngsters beneath the age of 6.

Govt features are the psychological processes that assist us self-regulate. They embrace the talents to override impulses, keep centered, and observe data in working reminiscence. Additionally they embrace the capability to modify flexibly in response to a change of guidelines.

What occurs to a toddler’s government features when she or he is watching an animated TV present that depicts incredible — usually inconceivable — occasions? When researchers have proven preschoolers (aged 4-6 years) such TV packages, these youngsters carried out worse on government operate duties instantly afterwards (Lillard et al 2015; Li et al 2020; Rhodes et al 2020; Fan et al 2021).

However the identical wasn’t true when adults learn the kids a fantasy story (Lilliard et al 2015). Nor does it seem that fantasy faux play is disruptive (quite the opposite, as you will note beneath). And seven-year-olds? These older youngsters didn’t expertise any reductions in government operate efficiency after watching animated fantasy packages (Fan et al 2021).

So what’s happening with fantasy tv and younger kids? It isn’t fully clear. However one principle is that kids beneath the age of 6 have restricted cognitive sources for preserving observe of all of the stunning, counter-factual issues that occur in incredible cartoon packages. The hassle is overtaxing, leaving them with fewer sources to carry out different government operate duties instantly afterwards (Fan et al 2021).

What about the concept that fantasy is a mere distraction? Is fantasy play simply senseless enjoyable? Is studying fantasy fiction a waste of time?

We’ve seen that sure sorts of fantasy — fantasy that’s horrifying, and fantasy that’s depicted in animated cartoons — could also be problematic for some preschoolers. Does this imply that the remainder of it’s okay? Some folks would possibly argue that fantasy is frivolous. That youngsters — no matter their age — are higher off in the event that they focus all their consideration on the sensible, on a regular basis world. However research point out that fantasy can profit kids in a number of essential methods.

Watching a film with magical content material could stimulate creativity in school-aged kids.

The proof comes from experiments involving the movie, Harry Potter and the Thinker’s Stone. Eugene Subbotsky and colleagues started by measuring kids’s inventive tendencies. They requested 6- and 8-year-olds to attract footage of “humorous, loopy, inconceivable” objects that “couldn’t exist in the actual world.” Additionally they challenged youngsters to maneuver throughout a room in as many alternative methods as potential.

Subsequent, with these baseline measurements in hand, the researchers assigned every little one to see considered one of two 15-minute movie clips. Each clips got here from the film, Harry Potter and the Thinker’s Stone. However one clip featured a number of magical content material. The opposite — whereas simply as action-packed — featured solely naturalistic occasions.

Did the content material have any affect? To search out out, Subbotsky’s group re-tested every little one’s skill to “assume outdoors the field,” and the outcomes favored the youngsters who had watched the magical content material. These kids confirmed larger beneficial properties of their inventive pondering efficiency (Subbotsky et al 2010). 

Fantasy fiction could encourage preschoolers to be taught new phrases.

How do we all know? Deena Skolnick-Weisberg and her colleagues recruited greater than 150 youngsters to take part in a preschool-based intervention. They assigned all the kids to take part in each day, 20-minute lengthy periods of storytelling and faux play. However there have been two totally different circumstances.

Half the youngsters have been assigned to the low-fantasy situation, which launched new vocabulary phrases within the context of storybooks and faux play that emphasised sensible occasions. These kids encountered some fantasy parts (i.e., anthropomorphic animals that may speak). However the conditions have been comparatively mundane (e.g., engaged on a farm, or making a pot of soup).

The opposite half have been assigned to the high-fantasy situation, which launched to new vocabulary phrases within the context of storybooks and faux play that featured completely imaginary creatures and occasions – like dragons hatching from breakfast eggs.

Earlier than the brand new periods started, the researchers examined kids’s vocabulary data. Then, after 8 days of the intervention, the youngsters have been examined once more. And there was a distinction between teams: Youngsters within the high-fantasy situation used extra new vocabulary of their spontaneous speech (Skolnick-Weisberg et al 2015).

Fantasy, faux play would possibly assist preschoolers develop government operate abilities and the power to learn feelings

It is smart that fake, fantasy play may assist youngsters hone their government operate abilities. To play efficiently with others, it’s important to preserve a brand new algorithm in your head. You will need to keep centered, and keep away from saying or doing issues that will spoil the shared fantasy. It’s good to be good at task-switching, juggling data in working reminiscence, and self-regulation.

It’s additionally believable that sure sorts of fantasy play may improve a toddler’s understanding of different folks’s feelings. Imagining alternate realities could also be good observe for imagining what goes on in one other particular person’s head (Dore and Lillard 2015).

What does the analysis inform us? Correlational research affirm hyperlinks between fantasy, government operate, and emotional savvy. For instance:

  • When researchers examined greater than 100 preschoolers, they discovered that youngsters with a wealthy fantasy life tended to carry out higher on duties that required them to shift from one algorithm to a different (Pierrucci et al 2013).
  • A follow-up examine on one other group of preschoolers discovered that fantasy-prone kids exhibited higher emotional regulation abilities than their friends, even after accounting for different elements, like a toddler’s language skill (Gilpin et al 2015).
  • Different analysis has reported associations between fantasy and emotional understanding. In a examine of first and second graders, youngsters who engaged in additional cognitively subtle fantasy play tended to be extra savvy concerning the feelings of others (Seja and Russ 1999). And a examine of preschoolers discovered that youngsters have been extra likey to develop superior “mind-reading” abilities if they’d a robust orientation in the direction of fantasy (Dore and Lillard 2015).

There may be experimental proof, too. Latest research recommend that we are able to enhance a facet of government operate — working reminiscence efficiency — by encouraging kids to have interaction in faux play.

For instance, Rachel Thibodeau and her colleagues randomly assigned 110 preschoolers (between the ages of three and 5) to considered one of three teams:

  • one third of the youngsters have been assigned to each day, adult-guided periods of faux, fantasy play (e.g., let’s be birds!)
  • one other group participated in guided periods of non-fantasy video games (like enjoying ball), and
  • the remaining kids skilled “enterprise as typical” at their preschools – no particular play periods.

After 5 weeks, kids within the faux play group made important beneficial properties in working reminiscence efficiency. Youngsters within the different two teams didn’t (Thibodeau et al 2016). And when the researchers drilled down – evaluating particular person kids within the faux play group – they discovered a dosage impact. The extra intensely a toddler engaged in faux, fantasy play, the larger his or her enchancment by the top of the examine.

It isn’t clear that the incredible parts of faux play have been essential for enhancing working reminiscence efficiency. In a more moderen examine of 3-year-olds, researchers discovered that it was the act of pretending collectively that mattered most — not how imaginative or incredible the storyline was (White and Carlson 2021). However fantasy tales could be useful if they supply youngsters with the motivation to have interaction in faux play.

There are limits, although, sure? Certainly it’s not useful to attempt to use fantasy to show youngsters about science or problem-solving in the actual world…

Researchers Emily Hopkins and Angeline Lillard name this the “Magic Schoolbus Dilemma”, a reference to a well-liked animated cartoon that makes an attempt to show science classes by means of tales that embrace fantasy parts — like a faculty bus able to altering it’s form and dimension.

As we’ve famous above, younger kids could be hyperskeptical about fantasy tales — dismissing even these components of a narrative which are merely inconceivable — not inconceivable. So we’d count on that youngsters can be much less prone to be taught new info introduced in fantasy tales. And a number of other experimental research have confirmed this (see summaries in Strouse et al 2018; Hopkins and Lillard 2021).

But even right here, there’s cause to assume that fantasy would possibly typically be useful. In an experiment performed on 5-year-olds, Hopkins and Lillard introduced youngsters with the answer to a sensible downside by embedding it in a narrative. Some kids heard a model of the story that was minimally incredible (set on a planet that was depicted as being nearly equivalent to earth). Different youngsters heard a model that integrated “deeper” fantasy parts (like orange grass and a inexperienced sky).

Youngsters in each teams have been uncovered to the identical covert lesson about problem-solving. However the kids who had encountered this data within the extra incredible story have been extra prone to apply the lesson in a subsequent, real-life check. Curiously, this distinction emerged solely if the extra incredible story additionally depicted some really inconceivable occasions (like a personality strolling by means of partitions), and solely if these inconceivable occasions have been introduced earlier than the academic content material within the story (Hopkins and Lillard 2021).

What was happening right here? Possibly these inconceivable occasions attracted kids’s curiosity — making youngsters pay nearer consideration. And maybe these 5-year olds have been mature sufficient to actually take pleasure in fantasy, and to comprehend that the next, sensible, problem-solving content material may very well be utilized to on a regular basis life. We’ll want extra analysis to type this out. In the meantime, it appears untimely to imagine that youngsters can’t be taught info introduced in tales with incredible content material. It would rely upon a toddler’s age, pursuits, and reasoning abilities.

The takeaway?

Fantasy isn’t at all times interesting — or acceptable — for younger kids. They may discover sure fantasy parts horrifying, or exhausting to trace. However this doesn’t imply that younger kids ought to keep away from all types of fantasy.

Quite the opposite, preschoolers who have interaction in faux, fantasy play have a tendency to point out stronger government operate abilities. Fantasy tales could encourage youngsters to be taught new vocabulary and new info. And — amongst older kids, at the least — we now have proof that fantasy motion pictures can encourage inventive pondering.

There’s nothing frivolous or impractical about these advantages. But practicality isn’t every little thing. Fantasy can be essential even with out these results. It’s a supply of pleasure and inspiration. It permits us to see issues from new views. It could tremendously broaden our expertise of life.

So we don’t want particular instructional justifications to indulge a toddler’s sense of fantasy. They’re merely icing on the cake. We owe kids fantasy in the identical means that we owe them music, humor, science, philosophy, and artwork. It’s a part of our inheritance as a large-brained, inventive species. It’s our kids’s birthright.

Extra studying

How else can we assist kids be taught? Take a look at these Parenting Science articles.

References: The advantages of fantasy fiction and imaginative play

Boerger EA. 2011. ‘In fairy tales fairies can disappear’: kids’s reasoning concerning the traits of people and fantasy figures. Br J Dev Psychol. 29(Pt 3):635-55.

Dore RA and Lillard AS. 2015. Principle of thoughts and kids’s engagement in fantasy worlds. Creativeness, Cognition and Character. 34(3): 230–242.

Gilpin AT, Brown MM, and Pierucci JM. 2015. Relations between fantasy orientation and emotion regulation in preschool. Early Training and Improvement 26(7): 920-932.

Hopkins EJ and Lillard AS. 2021. The Magic Faculty Bus dilemma: How fantasy impacts kids’s studying from tales. J Exp Baby Psychol. 210:105212.

Li H, Boguszewski Ok, and Lillard AS. 2015. Can that basically occur? Kids’s data concerning the actuality standing of fantastical occasions in tv.J Exp Baby Psychol. 139:99-114.

Li H, Hsueh Y, Yu H, Kitzmann KM. 2020. Viewing Fantastical Occasions in Animated Tv Reveals: Speedy Results on Chinese language Preschoolers’ Govt Operate. Entrance Psychol. 11:583174.

Nyhout A and Lee R. 2022. Younger kids should not pushed to discover imaginary worlds. Behav Mind Sci. 45:e291.

Petkova AV, Cain KM. 2017. Preschool Fantasy-Actuality Discrimination: Influences of Trait and Primed Fearfulness. J Genet Psychol. 178(2):133-138.

Pierucci JM, O’Brien CT, McInnis MA, Gilpin AT and Barber, AB. 2014. Fantasy orientation constructs and associated government operate improvement in preschool: Developmental advantages to government features by being a fantasy-oriented little one. Worldwide Journal of Behavioral Improvement 38(1): 62–69.

Seja AL, Russ SW. Kids’s fantasy play and emotional understanding. J Clin Baby Psychol. 1999 Jun;28(2):269-77.

Shtulman A and Carey S. 2007. Unbelievable or inconceivable? How kids cause about the opportunity of extraordinary occasions. Baby Dev. 2007 Might-Jun;78(3):1015-32.

Strouse GA, Nyhout A, Ganea PA. 2018. The Position of E book Options in Younger Kids’s Switch of Data from Image Books to Actual-World Contexts. Entrance Psychol. 9:50.

Subbotsky E, Hysted C, Jones N. 2010. Watching movies with magical content material facilitates creativity in kids. Percept Mot Abilities 111(1):261-77.

Subbotsky E and Slater E. 2011. Kids’s discrimination of incredible vs. sensible visible shows after watching a movie with magical content material. Percept Mot Abilities. 112(2):603-9.

Thibodeau RB, Gilpin AT, Brown MM, Meyer BA. 2016. The consequences of fantastical pretend-play on the event of government features: An intervention examine. J Exp Baby Psychol. 145:120-38.

Vaden VC and Woolley JD. 2011. Does God make it actual? Kids’s perception in non secular tales from the Judeo-Christian custom. Baby Dev. 82(4):1120-35.

Weisberg DS, Ilgaz H, Hirsh-Pasek Ok, Golinkoff RM, Nicolopoulou A and Dickinson DK. 2015. Shovels and swords: How sensible and fantastical themes have an effect on kids’s phrase studying. Cognitive Improvement, 35, 1-14.

Weisberg DS and Sobel DM. 2022. Imaginative processes in kids should not notably imaginative. Behav Mind Sci. 45:e303.

Woolley JD and Cox V. 2007. Improvement of beliefs about storybook actuality. Developmental Science. 10:681–693.

Woolley JD and E Ghossainy M. 2013. Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: kids as naïve skeptics. Baby Dev. 84(5):1496-510.

Zisenwine T, Kaplan M, Kushnir J, Sadeh A. 2013. Nighttime fears and fantasy-reality differentiation in preschool kids. Baby Psychiatry Hum Dev. 44(1):186-99.

picture of woman in cape by Choreograph / istock

Content material final modified 1/2023. Parts of the textual content derive from an earlier model of this text, written by the identical writer.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here